I voted yesterday during Massachusetts' first-ever experience as a Super Tuesday state. Luckily for me, it was during the week I was at home. I leave for Mexico tomorrow, and am taking a break from not-packing to write this.
Something that really bothers me is the proliferation of students supporting Barack Obama wanting "change" but without a concrete idea of what that change may be or how to implement it. The Ogroupies, if you will, but also the assumption that all people of my age range with any globalized point of view also want this "change." Yesterday evening I was catching up with an acquaintance as the polling results were starting to come in, and she was annoyed that Hillary Clinton carried Massachusetts. I said "Well, that's not my fault," at which point she continued the conversation as though I had voted for Obama without actually asking.
No, not so much. I was very excited when I filled in my little bubble next to John McCain on the ballot.
~~~
Whatever rhetoric all candidates are currently spewing about how electing them will change the face of America as we know it - it won't. Whoever is elected in 2008 will have the unenviable role of mopping up Bush-induced diarrhea for at least the next four years. Whoever is elected will have to deal with the residue of a president with 30% approval ratings and a congress with 20% approval ratings who are at loggerheads and get virtually nothing accomplished as the economy hits an inevitable downturn and international opinion continues to be lukewarm at best.
There are two things that the next president will have to do, and they are also pretty much the only things s/he will be able to do. #1 is deal with the economy. #2 is make nice with the world - with Iran and Europe, with China, with the quagmire in Iraq, with all the environmental stuff. The most important skill for both of these issues is a pragmatic, bi/non-partisan approach to actually getting treaties and legislation passed and implemented. Of anybody running, John McCain is the person with the most experience actually working in this manner.
No matter how inspirational a speaker Barack Obama is, the fact remains that he is three years into his first term as a senator. Over the past Senate, he has missed more than 1/3 of the votes for which he should have been on the Senate floor. It's hard to have a platform with the votes to show you stick to your platform if you're not actually voting. He doesn't have the experience that even a full senate term would give him.
In the past week or so, there have been a lot of parallels drawn between Obama and John F Kennedy, since the entire Kennedy family has also hopped on the Obandwagon. If Barack Obama is elected, he will run into the exact same problems that caused Kennedy to be in over his head during his two and a half years in office, for the exact same reasons. International issues will come to the forefront (only it will be militant Islamists instead of communists with the nukes) and his similar lack of experience in these matters will cause major fuck-upages to ensue. People seem to forget that, if you look at what actually happened while he was in office, Kennedy was actually a fairly middling president before he was martyred.
~~~
I am a registered undeclared voter in Massachusetts - the same thing as an independent. Yes, I am lucky that Massachusetts is one of the states where independents can vote in primaries. I would have changed my affiliation (and then immediately changed it back to an independent) if you had to be registered with a party. Mitt Romney, as the last governor of a Republican legacy in Massachusetts, was painfully disassociated from Massachusetts as a whole while he was governor. It was obvious that the only reason he was a governor was to groom himself for a presidential run. Even if I didn't like McCain, I would have wanted to cast a vote against Mitt. So voting as a Democrat in the primary was never really an option.
There are many ways to use a vote other than just supporting a candidate of your choice.
~~~
Also, John McCain likes ABBA. I like ABBA. I hope that at his inaugural ball, John McCain can get ABBA to regroup and perform. That, my friends, would be beyond awesome.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Monday, February 4, 2008
A comment on an aspect of my recent travels: The one redeeming thing about Portland Oregon is that it has the best bookshop I've been to in my entire life. Three stories and a square city block, arranged in its own order that works really well...go Powell's. This visit occurred after re-visiting The Word, my favourite used bookshop in Montreal (conveniently located around the corner from my old apartment) and walking out with $20 worth of I-meant-to-read-that, and finding an all-the-good-bits abridged edition of Tale of Genji at The Barrow, a used bookshop in Concord, about 10 minutes from my mom's house.
So, today, while running errands, I remembered that I wanted to get Kim, by Rudyard Kipling, and was also looking out for Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion, and wouldn't say no to After the Quake by Haruki Murakami and really did want to read The Good Terrorist by Doris Lessing even though I didn't have time to read it after I took it out of the library and returned it unread. If I had a copy of it forever, I could read it whenever! Instead of going home, a-detouring I went, first to Willow Books.
Willow Books is Acton's answer to the Borders/Barnes & Noble megalopolis - a locally owned version therein; not quite as big with a small cafe. I went to the classics section fully expecting to see at least the best-known book by the first English language Nobel Laureate. AT LEAST. Nope, 6 titles by Jack Kerouac, then One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest, then straight on to the L's. I went to the information desk and asked if they had Kim by Rudyard Kipling, and the woman smiled as she told me if I hadn't found it there, she guessed they didn't!
Fine.
At that point I was too annoyed to look for other things I wanted at Willow Books, and figured I might as well drive to Concord since I didn't have anything pressing. I went into The Concord Bookshop before I went back to The Barrow. To put this bookshop in perspective - Lois Lowry had a book signing there when I was 12 or 13. They had a huge Harry Potter party every time a new one was released, that always made it into the Boston news broadcasts. With Concord's literary tradition and old money, they are a pretty classy establishment and certainly afford to have something classic sitting on the shelves for a few months before a random weirdo (i.e. me) comes in and asks for it. It's a local bookshop, to be sure, but it's always been fairly highbrow.
Kim? No. Three Murakami titles, all of which I'd read. No Slouching Towards Bethlehem. No The Good Terrorist.
To give them the benefit of the doubt, the lack of The Good Terrorist could well be because it's been flagged by the Patriot Act because of its title.
If bookshops that sell new books have lowered the standards for what they stock merely to what is new and bright and shiny and can be sold only to people who also just seek that, they deserve what's coming to them. They deserve to have potential sales usurped by Amazon, which does have anything you want if you are willing to wait. If these owners and managers stock crap, they are basically giving those who would be their repeat customers no other option than going somewhere else for their various and sundry needs - as good literature is wont to be.
So, today, while running errands, I remembered that I wanted to get Kim, by Rudyard Kipling, and was also looking out for Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion, and wouldn't say no to After the Quake by Haruki Murakami and really did want to read The Good Terrorist by Doris Lessing even though I didn't have time to read it after I took it out of the library and returned it unread. If I had a copy of it forever, I could read it whenever! Instead of going home, a-detouring I went, first to Willow Books.
Willow Books is Acton's answer to the Borders/Barnes & Noble megalopolis - a locally owned version therein; not quite as big with a small cafe. I went to the classics section fully expecting to see at least the best-known book by the first English language Nobel Laureate. AT LEAST. Nope, 6 titles by Jack Kerouac, then One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest, then straight on to the L's. I went to the information desk and asked if they had Kim by Rudyard Kipling, and the woman smiled as she told me if I hadn't found it there, she guessed they didn't!
Fine.
At that point I was too annoyed to look for other things I wanted at Willow Books, and figured I might as well drive to Concord since I didn't have anything pressing. I went into The Concord Bookshop before I went back to The Barrow. To put this bookshop in perspective - Lois Lowry had a book signing there when I was 12 or 13. They had a huge Harry Potter party every time a new one was released, that always made it into the Boston news broadcasts. With Concord's literary tradition and old money, they are a pretty classy establishment and certainly afford to have something classic sitting on the shelves for a few months before a random weirdo (i.e. me) comes in and asks for it. It's a local bookshop, to be sure, but it's always been fairly highbrow.
Kim? No. Three Murakami titles, all of which I'd read. No Slouching Towards Bethlehem. No The Good Terrorist.
To give them the benefit of the doubt, the lack of The Good Terrorist could well be because it's been flagged by the Patriot Act because of its title.
If bookshops that sell new books have lowered the standards for what they stock merely to what is new and bright and shiny and can be sold only to people who also just seek that, they deserve what's coming to them. They deserve to have potential sales usurped by Amazon, which does have anything you want if you are willing to wait. If these owners and managers stock crap, they are basically giving those who would be their repeat customers no other option than going somewhere else for their various and sundry needs - as good literature is wont to be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
